Print Friendly and PDF Print or Download

Workarounds: 6 ways to reduce their risks

All healthcare professionals must contend with many competing demands during a typical shift (delivering care to patients/clients, educating families and caregivers, communicating with other members of the healthcare team, completing documentation, to name just a few), often causing them to seek ways to compress everything they must do into a short time frame.

In these situations, it can be tempting to engage in “workarounds”, subverting policies, procedures, and even standards of care to pick up precious minutes. The goal is a worthy one — more time with patients. But workarounds are potentially dangerous to patients and healthcare providers, with some leading to serious consequences such as harm to patients and subsequent legal actions against providers — and the organizations that employ them.

Healthcare leaders and administrators can protect healthcare professionals, themselves, and their organizations from legal jeopardy by understanding the nature of workarounds and creating an environment that minimizes them.

 

Causes of workarounds

Debono and colleagues provide this useful definition of workarounds: “Observed or described behaviors that may differ from organizationally prescribed or intended procedures in which workers ‘circumvent’ or temporarily ‘fix’ an evident or perceived workflow hindrance to meet a goal or to achieve it more readily.” In essence, a workaround occurs when a healthcare professional takes action that deviates from established policies and procedures to accomplish the work they need to do — delivering patient care.

Healthcare professionals may engage in workarounds when they encounter barriers to their ability to deliver care. Time is a frequently cited barrier, but many causes lie behind this one word. In a scoping review, Debono and colleagues categorized factors contributing to workarounds as organizational (such as insufficient staffing, productivity pressures), work process (such as new technology not matching workflow), patient-related (such as the need to ensure patients receive timely care, or policies not in the best interest of the patient), individual clinician (such as fatigue), and social and professional (such as poor communication between clinicians). A key factor to remember is that in most cases, healthcare providers generally engage in these behaviors because they feel it is important to overcome obstacles and deliver needed care to patients.

Workarounds can be viewed on a continuum. For example, they can be innovative when, perhaps, a more efficient workflow is identified. On the other hand, they can be harmful, resulting in patient morbidity and mortality. (Deutsch notes that in addition to immediate danger to patients, workarounds make it less likely that an underlying problem will be identified and addressed.) Certainly, some workarounds pose less potential harm to patients than others, but in general, workarounds are something to be avoided because of patient safety risks.

 

Avoiding workarounds

Clinical and other organizational leaders can take several steps to reduce workarounds:

Engage in dialogue. Leaders and staff should collaborate when implementing new technology or practices to ensure they fit into workflows. A systematic review found that workarounds most frequently occurred when new technologies or processes were implemented.

Leaders also should regularly ask staff about problems in workflows and to share any workarounds they have engaged in. It can be helpful to observe care directly, since some healthcare professionals may not be conscious of workarounds they use. Be aware of situations particularly vulnerable to workarounds, such as when a new process is implemented. In addition to considering the reason for the workaround, those that do not put patients in harm’s way should be evaluated to see if they could result in positive practice changes.

Promote a culture of safety. Leaders need to communicate to staff that the primary goal of the organization is to deliver safe, quality patient care. While that may be stating the obvious, too often staff perceive that the goal is to complete all the work in the allotted time; this message is reinforced when organizations don’t provide needed support such as adequate staffing.

Another component of a safety culture is a just culture, where there is open communication and a blame-free environment. Errors should be investigated with the goal of identifying root causes, rather than assigning blame. Steven Spear, a senior fellow at the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, suggests that when an error occurs because of a workaround, helpful questions include: What went wrong? What got in my way? Why did it get in my way? What can I — what can we — do differently going forward that will address the causal factors and remove the bad experience?

Hold staff accountable. A just culture does not preclude holding staff accountable for their actions. Those who engage in reckless behaviors should be counseled and disciplined. A behavior is considered reckless when the person consciously engages in it while knowing that there is substantial and unjustifiable risk. Leaders can work with human resources departments to establish procedures to follow in these situations.

Provide needed resources. Often healthcare providers will engage in workarounds when they don’t have the resources they need to care for patients. These resources include adequate staff, equipment, and supplies. For example, a study found that understaffing during the COVID-19 pandemic led to greater use of safety workarounds.

Provide education. Education about the potential dangers of workarounds should include reasons for it and the importance of speaking up when someone feels a workaround is necessary. It also can be helpful to discuss normalization of deviance. When someone chooses to use a workaround and no negative consequences occur, there is the tendency to repeat the workaround and drift away from the standard of behavior, resulting in deviance that can potentially effect patient outcomes and even result in harm.

Ensure a user-friendly electronic health record (EHR). Cumbersome EHRs are a frequent source of workarounds, which can lead to patient harm. Including staff when selecting an EHR and soliciting their input on a regular basis to detect ways the EHR can be made more user-friendly can help reduce workarounds. 

 

Protecting patients, providers, and organizations

While sometimes helpful in illuminating ways processes can be improved, workarounds more often result in an increased risk of patient harm. This harm can lead to legal action for caregivers, leaders, and organizations. By minimizing workarounds, organization leaders can help keep patients safe and reduce the risk of liability.
 

By: Cynthia Saver, MS, RN, is president of CLS Development, Inc., in Columbia, Md.
 

References

American Association of Post-Acute Care Nursing. Resident safety and nurse workarounds. 2022. https://www.aapacn.org/article/resident-safety-and-nurse-workarounds/

Andel SA, Tedone AM, Shen W, Arvan ML. Safety implications of different forms of understaffing among nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(1):121-130. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8450811/

Debono DS, Greenfield D, Travaglia JF, et al. Nurses’ workarounds in acute healthcare settings: A scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:175. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/1472-6963-13-175

Deutsch ES. Workarounds: Trash or treasure? Pa Patient Saf Advis. 2017;14(3). http://patientsafety.pa.gov/ADVISORIES/Pages/201709_Workarounds.aspx

Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP). The differences between human error, at-risk behavior, and reckless behavior are key to a just culture. ISMP Medication Safety Alert! Acute care edition. June 18, 2020;25(12). https://www.ismp.org/resources/differences-between-human-error-risk-behavior-and-reckless-behavior-are-key-just-culture

Lee S, Lee M-S. Nurses’ electronic medical record workarounds in a tertiary teaching hospital. Comput Inform Nurs. 2021;39(7):367-374. https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/Abstract/2021/07000/Nurses__Electronic_Medical_Record_Workarounds_in_a.6.aspx

McCord JL, Lippincott CR, Abreu E, Schmer C. A systematic review of nursing practice workarounds. Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2022;41(6):347-356. https://journals.lww.com/dccnjournal/Abstract/2022/11000/A_Systematic_Review_of_Nursing_Practice.11.aspx

Spear S. Solving workarounds. Institute for Healthcare Improvement. n.d. https://www.ihi.org/education/IHIOpenSchool/resources/Pages/Activities/SteveSpearSolvingWorkarounds.aspx

Wright MI, Polivka B, Odom-Forren J, Christiann BJ. Normalization of deviance: Concept analysis. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2021;44(2):171-180. https://journals.lww.com/advancesinnursingscience/Abstract/2021/04000/Normalization_of_Deviance__Concept_Analysis.8.aspx

Disclaimer: The information offered within this article reflects general principles only and does not constitute legal advice by Healthcare Providers Service Organization (HPSO) or establish appropriate or acceptable standards of professional conduct. Readers should consult with an attorney if they have specific concerns. Neither Affinity Insurance Services, Inc. nor HPSO assumes any liability for how this information is applied in practice or for the accuracy of this information. Please note that Internet hyperlinks cited herein are active as of the date of publication but may be subject to change or discontinuation.
 

This publication is intended to inform Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., customers of potential liability in their practice. This information is provided for general informational purposes only and is not intended to provide individualized guidance. All descriptions, summaries or highlights of coverage are for general informational purposes only and do not amend, alter or modify the actual terms or conditions of any insurance policy. Coverage is governed only by the terms and conditions of the relevant policy. Any references to non-Aon, AIS, NSO, HPSO websites are provided solely for convenience, and Aon, AIS, NSO and HPSO disclaims any responsibility with respect to such websites. This information is not intended to offer legal advice or to establish appropriate or acceptable standards of professional conduct. Readers should consult with a lawyer if they have specific concerns. Neither Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., HPSO, nor CNA assumes any liability for how this information is applied in practice or for the accuracy of this information.

Healthcare Providers Service Organization is a registered trade name of Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., a licensed producer in all states (TX 13695); (AR 100106022); in CA, MN, AIS Affinity Insurance Agency, Inc. (CA 0795465); in OK, AIS Affinity Insurance Services, Inc.; in CA, Aon Affinity Insurance Services, Inc., (CA 0G94493), Aon Direct Insurance Administrators and Berkely Insurance Agency and in NY, AIS Affinity Insurance Agency.