Bookmark and Share

Special Edition Legal Case Study


Healthcare Professionals and Medical Malpractice: A Case Study with Risk Management Strategies

Medical malpractice claims can be asserted against any healthcare provider. Although there may be a perception that physicians are held responsible for the majority of lawsuits, the reality is that healthcare professionals, including physical therapists, pharmacists and counselors are more frequently finding themselves defending the care they provide.


Physical Therapist Edition

Case Study: Overly Aggressive Treatment

This case involves a 42-year old female with a long history of bilateral knee injuries and subsequent surgeries. She received her first surgery at age 14 to her right knee and then both knees at ages 16, 18, 21 and then again at 40... Read the Full Case with Risk Management Recommendations

Pharmacist Edition

Case Study: Failure to Monitor

In this case, the defendant pharmacist was employed by a home infusion pharmacy where he was the head pharmacist and also was appointed director of pharmacy. The home infusion company provided home health care to patients, including the dispensing and administration of oral and parenteral medications, nursing care, personal care services and case management... Read the Full Case with Risk Management Recommendations

Counselor Edition

Case Study: Inappropriate Behavior and Sexual Misconduct by Counselor

The defendant was a licensed mental health counselor in solo practice who treated the client (a 51-year-old married woman) for multiple issues over approximately a two-year period. The client's intake form stated she was seeking treatment for problems in her marriage, symptoms related to being an adult child of an alcoholic, co-dependency and difficulties with communication. The defendant treated the client both separately and in couples' therapy sessions with her husband... Read the Full Case with Risk Management Recommendations




June 2009 Legal Case Study



Psychologist Claims No Doctor-Patient Relationship Existed With Attorney Who Committed Suicide Shortly After Meeting Where Psychologist was Present - Defense Verdict.

The defendant psychologist was hired by a law firm to consult regarding the plaintiff’s decedent. The decedent was one of the law firm’s partners whom they believed had a serious alcohol abuse problem. The defendant was present during a meeting with the decedent. Several hours after the meeting, the decedent became intoxicated and committed suicide with a self-inflicted shotgun wound.

The plaintiff alleged that the defendant psychologist and the decedent had formed a tangible doctor-patient relationship, and that the defendant’s conduct during the meeting did not meet the standard of care, resulting in the suicide death only hours after seeing the defendant. The plaintiff’s experts argued that even though there was no contract between the defendant and the decedent, the defendant psychologist owed a duty to the plaintiff.

The defendant contended that he was a consultant to the law firm only, and never had a defined treatment relationship with the decedent. Additionally, the defendant claimed that he met the standard of care and that nothing he did or failed to do contributed to the decedent’s independent decision to commit suicide.

The defendant’s experts testified that the decedent’s suicide death was caused by the decedent’s own independent and willful actions, and that this action was not foreseeable.

The jury returned a defense verdict, according to a report.

With permission from Medical Malpractice Verdicts, Settlements & Experts; Lewis Laska, Editor, 901 Church St., Nashville, TN 37203-3411, 1-800-298-6288.

Search the Archives

By Topic
By Keyword